In the ever-evolving world of technology, artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in the creative realm, generating music, art, poems, and even movie scripts. But the question remains: is AI art copyrighted? Let’s dive into the complexities of copyright law and AI-generated creations.
Under Australian law, a work can only be protected by copyright if a human author contributed “independent intellectual effort”. AI tools do not currently have legal status and cannot own copyright. It means that works solely created by AI may not be protected by copyright, leaving the ownership of such creations in a legal grey area.
The level of human contribution is crucial in determining whether works generated using AI are protected by copyright and who owns them. For example, if a creator produced an image and used an AI tool to edit the image, the human contribution is likely enough for copyright protection. However, it remains unclear whether other contributions, such as writing, tweaking, training the algorithm or pre-selecting and editing the output, would be enough to attract copyright protection.
In a recent US federal court ruling, artwork created by generative AI platforms was deemed ineligible for copyright protection due to the lack of “human authorship”. This decision has sparked debate and speculation about the long-term implications of AI-generated content and its ownership.
In Australia, the situation remains uncertain, with no lawsuits like the US case filed yet. Legal experts suggest that the issue of human authorship may arise but might not be insurmountable in all cases.
Under Australian law, a work can only be protected by copyright if there is a human author who contributed “independent intellectual effort”. AI tools do not currently have legal status and cannot own copyright. This means that works solely created by AI may not be protected by copyright, leaving the ownership of such creations in a legal grey area.
If a work generated using AI has enough human input, the human contributor would own the copyright. However, it remains unclear what level of human contribution is necessary for copyright protection.
Generally, it is an infringement of copyright to digitally reproduce works without permission1. If you make a digital copy of a work to train an AI, this use will require permission from the copyright holder. However, there are currently no copyright exceptions in Australia specific to data mining or using works for machine learning
The question of whether AI art is copyrighted remains a complex and evolving issue. As AI advances and blurs the lines between human and machine-generated creations, the legal landscape must adapt to address the challenges and uncertainties surrounding copyright protection and ownership. Until then, artists and creators must navigate the grey areas of AI-generated art with caution and a keen understanding of the current legal framework.
Up until working with Casey, we had only had poor to mediocre experiences outsourcing work to agencies. Casey & the team at CJ&CO are the exception to the rule.
Communication was beyond great, his understanding of our vision was phenomenal, and instead of needing babysitting like the other agencies we worked with, he was not only completely dependable but also gave us sound suggestions on how to get better results, at the risk of us not needing him for the initial job we requested (absolute gem).
This has truly been the first time we worked with someone outside of our business that quickly grasped our vision, and that I could completely forget about and would still deliver above expectations.
I honestly can’t wait to work in many more projects together!
![The ‘Giveaway Piggy Back Scam’ In Full Swing [2022]](https://www.cjco.com.au/wp-content/uploads/pexels-nataliya-vaitkevich-7172791-1-scaled-2-683x1024.jpg)
Disclaimer
*The information this blog provides is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as financial or professional advice. The information may not reflect current developments and may be changed or updated without notice. Any opinions expressed on this blog are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author’s employer or any other organization. You should not act or rely on any information contained in this blog without first seeking the advice of a professional. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this blog. The author and affiliated parties assume no liability for any errors or omissions.
